Comments on: File Storage: Microsoft Mesh vs. DropBox

By: Festus

Festus — Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:41:26 +0000

Dropbox’s wins here.. sooo simple,fast..on point(for know forget the 2gb space challenge,either way there’s the power option i.e pay for more).just try it

By: Victor Arocha

Victor Arocha — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:18:40 +0000

I have tested Mesh for almost 6 months and then Dropbox for 2 months.. Dropbox is faster, with a better web interface and use less resources in my netbook.

My choice is Dropbox.

By: Luckyal

Luckyal — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:59:12 +0000

Dropbox rocks. You don’t have to deal with MS Sliverlight, and the min requirements your machines have to have in order to install it.

By: Liueff

Liueff — Sun, 09 Nov 2008 14:41:25 +0000

Dropbox is not safe,a small company

By: admin

admin — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:54:34 +0000

ok ok, they have a web interface.

By: Adam

Adam — Sun, 02 Nov 2008 09:49:53 +0000

As pointed out above, disadvantage “2. no web interface” for Dropbox is incorrect.

http://www.getdropbox.com

By: bill gates

bill gates — Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:09:19 +0000

“no web interface” from Dropbox disadvantages.

You kidding me. Their web interface rocks as well.

Dropbox is 10 times more better than Mesh with only one shortcoming, not disadvantage, 2gb vs 5gb.

I am sure this is will be overcomed soon.

By: hax

hax — Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:39:23 +0000

Lol, dude DropBox has a web interface and it is pwn.

By: Dean Lewis

Dean Lewis — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:44:17 +0000

One of the disadvantages listed for Mesh is wrong, there is desktop integration if you download the Mesh software to your machine. When I save files into a folder I have chosen to be on my Mesh everything it automatic and the icon on my task-bar reflects that.

It’s the 5GB vs 2GB that wins me to Mesh